Legal Opinion

CASTRO v. LANCASTER LOFT

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 5, 2025No. 4:24-cv-00156Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION RUTH CASTRO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:24-cv-00156-SEB-KMB ) LANCASTER LOFT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Now before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Ruth Castro's most recently filed amended complaint [Dkt. 90] for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Screening the Complaint Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

When a plaintiff is allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, as Ms. Castro has been permitted to do, the Court has an obligation to ensure that her complaint is legally sufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court must…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Todd A. Lagerstrom v. Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Thomas Wilson v. Warren County, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API