Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided July 24, 2000No. 499CV169, 499CV181PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs brought these consolidated 1 actions to challenge the legality of the University of Georgia’s (UGA’s) 1999 admissions process, specifically the parts that rely upon an applicant’s race and gender. Doc. # 1. A group of high school and UGA students intervened. Doc. # 75. The Court dismissed some claims and defendants on procedural grounds. See doc. # # 55, 99, 114, 160. The individual plaintiffs assert that defendant UGA’s 1999 freshman admissions program violated 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (Title VI), and 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (Title IX). Doc. # 160.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Wooden v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Gratz v. BollingerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Grutter v. BollingerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API