Legal Opinion

Stanton v. LINCOLN LIFE & ANNUITY CO. OF NEW YORK

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 1, 2010No. 09-CV-6430 CJSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action to recover accidental death insurance benefits, brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The decedent was intoxicated and operating a snowmobile when he struck a tree and was killed. Defendants denied coverage, on two grounds: 1) the death was not accidental; and 2) the policy excludes coverage for losses caused by “driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated.” Plaintiff, a beneficiary of the subject policy, contends that the decision denying benefits…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API