Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1996No. 96SA386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case the respondent, Glen B. Clark, Jr., and the deputy disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommends that discipline be imposed in the range of a public censure to a ninety-day suspension from the practice of law. In approving the stipulation and recommendation, an inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee recommended a ninety-day'suspension. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RaderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney ASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. People v. KramSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Angelique LAYTON, 36480Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney ASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API