Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney A
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
552 Pa. 223 (1998)
714 A.2d 402
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
v.
ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY A, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted September 24, 1997.
Decided July 8, 1998.
Albert G. Blakey, for respondent.
Joseph J. Huss, Lemoyne, for Disciplinary Counsel.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice:
In this appeal from a decision of the Disciplinary Board (Board), we address the element of scienter necessary to establish a prima facie violation of Rule of Professional Conduct (Rule) 8.4(c) where the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- B & B Asphalt Co. v. T. S. McShane Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McMillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.