Legal Opinion

Esmar v. Haeussler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCULLEN, J.

This suit was brought by appellant, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against respondents, who will be referred to sometimes as defendants and sometimes as Paul Brown & Company, to set aside an account stated and for an accounting covering transactions between the parties during the period June, 1929, and September, 1931, involving the purchase and sale of securities. A trial before the court resulted in a judgment in favor of defendants, and the dismissal of plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff took an appeal to the Supreme Court, but that court held it did not have jurisdiction and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Banta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leuzinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Mark Twain Plaza Bank v. Lowell H. Listrom & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Leuzinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Mark Twain Plaza Bank v. Lowell H. Listrom & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API