Manifold v. Jones
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, C. J. —
The complaint of the plaintiff, here the *213appellee, is a complaint in the ordinary form to quiet title. The facts pleaded in the second paragraph of the answer and in the cross-complaint are substantially the same, and we give a synopsis of the facts stated in the answer. The facts pleaded are, in substance, these: Conrad Crossley died the owner in fee of the land in controversy. He left a will containing, among others, these provisions:
“ Item 3d. To my son, Corydon W. Crossley, I give and bequeath the following real estate: The undivided one-half of the southwest quarter of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Markover v. KraussIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Preston v. BosworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Van Horn v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- State ex rel. Dark v. MannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909