Legal Opinion

OKKER EX REL. OKKER v. Chrome Furniture Mfg. Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 17, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. Super. 295 (1953)

97 A.2d 699

JAMES V. OKKER, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JAMES OKKER, AND JAMES OKKER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CHROME FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 1, 1953.

Decided June 17, 1953.

Before Judges STEIN, PROCTOR and CONLON.

Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Joseph V. Fumagalli, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).

Mr. Samuel Doan argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Charles C. Stalter, attorney).

Th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bacak v. HogyaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Heckel v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. Ross v. OrrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Miller v. Davis and Averill, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  5. Fleckenstein v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Hermes v. StaianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Liberatori v. Yellow Cab Co. of PhiladelphiaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. M. Dietz & Sons, Inc. v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Van Staveren v. FW Woolworth Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API