Kimberly-Clark Corporation & Subsidiaries, Relators/Cross-Respondents v. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
This appeal presents a constitutional challenge to a legislative repeal of provisions of a multistate tax compact that permitted corporate taxpayers, for a¡ period of time, to calculate their Minnesota tax liability using a formula promulgated by .a multistate tax commission. In 2013, rela-tors Kimberly-Clark Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively “Kimberly Clark”) sought to amend their Minnesota corporate franchise tax returns for tax years 2007 through 2009 by re-calculating their state tax liability using an income apportionment formula that the Minnesota…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Graphic Packaging Corp. v. HegarTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Health Net, Inc. v. Dep't of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Drake Snell v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, in his official capacity, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Binkley for President 2024 v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.