Legal Opinion

Bates v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

In this action of ejectment by T. G-. Bates against Nathan Wright, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Wright, and the correctness of this ruling is challenged by the appeal.

Bates asserted title by deed from S. N. Taylor, who obtained a patent covering the land on May 2, 1887, and also by adverse possession. Wright denied Bates’ title, and pleaded title in himself for a portion of the land by adverse possession for more than thirty years. It developed on the trial that, although the land was covered by the Taylor patent, it lay within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tennis Coal Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Trimble v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815
  3. Patton v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Cumberland Coal Co. v. CroleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Gas, Oil & Coal Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Holliday v. Tennis Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Jones v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API