City of Rochester v. Upman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Olmsted county. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
This was a prosecution before the city justice of the city of Rochester, for selling spirituous and intoxicating liquors, without a license, in violation of a city ordinance. The defendant, having been convicted of the offense charged, and fined in the sum of one hundred dollars, appealed to the district court for.Olmsted county, and the judgment of the city justice having been there affirmed, he .appeals to this court from an order of said district court denying him a new trial. The appeal to the district court appears to have been treated as an appeal upon questions of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of St. Paul v. ColterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Tomlinson v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. ReckardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- State v. MellorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.