State v. Williams
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
By appellant’s sole point on this appeal he challenges the constitutionality of § 211.071 of the Juvenile Code, §§ 211.011 to 211.431. All statutory references are to RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S.
Appellant was charged and found guilty of an armed robbery which he committed when sixteen years and approximately ten months of age. Therefore, he was a “child” within the definition set forth in § 211.021. After a hearing pursuant to § 211.071, which is not challenged on this appeal, the juvenile court determined that appellant was “not a proper subject to be dealt with” under the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lentine v. State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Eagleton v. McQueenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State v. Katz Drug CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. CurtisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Prokopf v. WhaleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- A JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- People in Interest of LVASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. EverfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.