Legal Opinion
Koken v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.(PBGC)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-4342PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBRENO, District Judge.
This action involves a dispute between the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, M. Diane Koken (the “Commissioner”), in her official capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”) and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”). The PBGC is seeking to enforce several perfected statutory liens it holds against certain subsidiaries of Reliance. On August 25, 2004, the Commissioner filed a petition in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that the liens held by the PBGC…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koken v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Carstens v. Michigan Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Gibson v. McClaffertyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2025