Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Moore
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided July 17, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
S. A. Moore, as receiver of the First National Bank of Florence, filed a petition under thé provisions of section 5234 of the Revised Statutes, as amended May 15,1916 (39 Stat. 121 [Comp. Stat. § 9821]), for authority to sell certain assets of the insolvent hank. The substantial facts set forth in the petition are as follows:
The First National Bank of Florence became insolvent, and under the act of Congress the petitioner was appointed receiver. Thereafter a national bank was organized with the name of the First National Bank in Florence, and made an offer to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex Parte CockcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hulse v. ArgetsingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- First Empire Bank-New York v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1981
- First Empire Bank-New York (By Its Successor in Interest Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. Of Buffalo, New York, a New York Banking Corporation), and Societe Generale, a French Banking Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of United States National Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of United States National Bank, Counterclaimants-Cross-Appellants v. First Empire Bank-New York and Societe Generale, Counterdefendants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Coriell v. Morris White, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.