Legal Opinion

State v. Barger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1938No. 34,019PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

The defendant was found guilty of obtaining money from Charles A. Beeler and Lottie Beeler by means of and by the use of false and fraudulent representations, in violation of our statute G. S. 1935, 21-551, and appeals.

The facts established by the state may be summarized as follows:

Charles A. Beeler is a locomotive engineer and has been employed by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company since the year 1890. At the time of the trial he was 68 years of age. The defendant was introduced to Mr. Beeler by a man named Barber, at Beeler’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. In re SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. State v. DeweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. State v. FleemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. State v. HandkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Ellenwood v. CramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. State v. Johnson & UnderwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API