In re Allen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, setting apart a homestead, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment setting apart a homestead under the insolvency laws, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The declaration of homestead covered lots 4 and 5 of block 39 of the town of Chico. These two lots adjoined each other, and were together under the value of five thousand dollars. The family dwelling was upon lot 5, and the outhouses, chicken-yard, etc., covered the rear portion of lot 4. It is conceded that the homestead was valid as to lot 5, and as to the above-mentioned portion of lot 4. But it is contended that the front portion of lot 4—…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gregg v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Maloney v. HeferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Berry v. MeirSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Phelps v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lorenz v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.