Legal Opinion
McManaway v. KBR, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 4, 2012No. Civil Action No. H-10-1044PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the KBR Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Seventh Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6), filed on March 30, 2012 (Instrument No. 217). On August 16, 2012, the Court entered an Order denying Defendants’ Motion (Instrument No. 392). That Order (Instrument No. 392) is revised to clarify the legal standard employed by the Court in reviewing the motion to dismiss. Now, the Court directs the Clerk’s Office to replace the August 16th Order (Instrument No. 392) with the Order below.
*658Plaintiffs are soldiers…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jaser v. AT&T Services IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
- Mark McManaway v. KBR, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Mark McManaway v. KBR, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014