Dainese v. Cooke
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
These are appeals by Dainese in two cases from decrees of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in one' of which he was complainant, and his bill was dismissed. In the other lie was defendant, and a perpetual injunction was decreed against him. As the subject-matter of these suits is the same, they will be considered together in this court, and should have been consolidated and heard together in the court below, though two separate' decrees were rendered, and separate records are presented to us.
The appellant’s bill was filed first. He therein alleges, that having made a contract…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Call Bond & Mortgage Co. v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- State Ex Rel. A. Hynek & Sons Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Selligman v. Western Southern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Invader Oil & Refining Co. of Texas v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.