Legal Opinion

Henault Mining Co. v. Tysk

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1969No. 22545PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Henault Mining Company seeks a declaratory judgment establishing the validity of 18 mining claims and for a review, under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1009, of an adverse decision of the Secretary of the Interior. The history of the proceedings is set forth in the margin.1

The sole question here presented is whether, as the Government contends, the District Court erred in its determina*768tion that the locations of the claims in question were based upon valid discoveries within the meaning of 30 U.S.C. § 23. The pertinent facts are set forth in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Henault Mining Co. v. TyskDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Merle I. Zweifel and Kenneth RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Del Webb Conservation Holding Corp. v. TolmanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
  3. Multiple Use, Inc. v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1972
  4. Harold E. L. Barton v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the Unitedstates of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Humboldt Placer Mining Company, a Corporation, and Del De Rosier v. Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API