Legal Opinion

Humboldt Placer Mining Company, a Corporation, and Del De Rosier v. Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1977No. 74-2762PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

At issue are appellants’ rights to compensation for the seizure by the United States of appellants’ interests in certain unpatented placer mining claims, located on Stuart’s Fork of the Trinity River in Trinity County, California. On June 27, 1957, the United States commenced a condemnation action in the District Court for the Northern District of California to secure title to these claims and other property for use in connection with the construction of Trinity Dam and Reservoir. Later, on March 17, 1960, the Secretary of the Interior commenced administrative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. Merle I. Zweifel and Kenneth RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Alfred N. Verrue v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Frank Melluzzo and Wanita Melluzzo v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert B. Lara v. The Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Charlestone Stone Products Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API