Legal Opinion

State v. Brashers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 2015No. CR-14-934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJim Hannah, Chief Justice

pThe State of Arkansas appeals an order of the Independence County Circuit Court granting a motion to suppress in favor of appellee Christopher Brashers. For reversal, the State argues that the circuit court erred as a matter of law in interpreting Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499, 98 S.Ct. 1942, 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978), by resolving the issue of a warrantless search using agency principles and in ruling that insurance investigators acted as agents of a law-enforcement agency. We hold that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction because the circuit court’s order was a mixed question of law…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. William Nelson v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
  2. State v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. State v. SiegelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. State of Arkansas v. Tyler Dewayne PateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2023
  5. State v. CanadaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API