Legal Opinion

Mandell v. Bayliss

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2016No. DA 16-0015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Michael J. Mandell (Mandell) contests the Sixth Judicial District Court’s granting of relief in quantum meruit and awarding of attorney fees to Appellees Bayliss Ward and Bayliss Architects, P.C. (Bayliss) in this residential construction dispute. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. We address the following issues:

1. Did the District Court err in granting equitable relief in quantum meruit, despite violation of the statutory requirement that residential construction contracts be in writing?

2. Did the District Court err in awarding attorney fees…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brown v. ThorntonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  3. James Talcott Construction, Inc. v. P&D Land EnterprisesMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Blue Ridge Homes, Inc. v. TheinMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Barney v. LasburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tch Bldrs. And Remod. v. Elements Of Const.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Adams v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
  3. Mcnain Holdings v. Wilderness PreserveMontana Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API