Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Cincinnati Municipal Court

Decided December 29, 1966No. Nos. T 61544, T 61545PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeee, J.

A Cincinnati police officer charged the defendant with driving an automobile without an operator’s license in violation of Section 4507.02, Bevised Code, and with driving through a red traffic light in violation of a Cincinnati ordinance. Both are misdemeanors.

Some days after she was cited by the police officer, she appeared in Cincinnati Traffic Court, on the 13th day of December, and pleaded guilty to both charges. She was sentenced to pay a fine of $100.00 and costs on the operator’s license conviction and her rights to drive were suspended for ninety days. She was also required to pay a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KlingenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Valdez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Mellott v. AlvisOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Akers v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Twyman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Hemphill v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API