Legal Opinion

Valdez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1924No. 8308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Appellant is under conviction for the murder of Bartola Nigrite with punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

We deem it unnecessary to set out the facts. The State’s evidence showed a killing under circumstances which eliminated manslaughter and self-defense or defense of another. Appellant’s evidence ■raised the issues of defense of his father and of manslaughter. They were fairly submitted in the court’s charge.

It is stated in the motion for new trial that since conviction information had° come to counsel for appellant that he was under seventeen years of age.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fifer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Kellum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Slade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Bannister v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Broadway v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1971
  4. Ashby v. HaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API