Legal Opinion

Payne v. Borkat

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1979No. 35433PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

The parties to this case are owners of lots in a residential subdivision in Tifton, Georgia. The plaintiffs filed a petition for declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that a restrictive covenant in their deeds is unenforceable. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal.

The parties trace titles to their respective properties to a common grantor, who placed certain restrictive covenants on their lots in 1946, to run for a period of 50 years. Two of the restrictive covenants are drawn into controversy in this case: Restrictive Covenant 2,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Shoaf v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Jordan v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Smith v. Pindar Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Municipal Electric Authority v. 2100 Riveredge Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Goddard v. IrbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. CPI Phipps, LLC v. 100 Park Avenue Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Matera Investors, Inc. v. Sunset Lake Fishing & Hunting ClubDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988
  5. City of Alpharetta v. Estate of SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API