City of Alpharetta v. Estate of Sims
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentCarley, Justice
In my opinion, denial of the application for a conditional use permit was a gross abuse of the City’s discretion. Therefore, I dissent to the reversal of the trial court’s grant of mandamus in favor of appellees.
The City’s ordinance provides that a conditional use “shall be permitted subject to” certain specified conditions. “Shall” is generally construed as a word of command. State v. Henderson, 263 Ga. 508, 510 (436 SE2d 209) (1993). Thus, if appellees satisfied the conditions enumerated in the ordinance, the City had no discretion to deny their application. Jackson v. Abercrombie, 229 Ga.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Fulton County v. BartenfeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Jackson v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Payne v. BorkatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Municipal Electric Authority v. 2100 Riveredge Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986