Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Alpharetta v. Estate of Sims

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 2000No. S00A0705Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

In my opinion, denial of the application for a conditional use permit was a gross abuse of the City’s discretion. Therefore, I dissent to the reversal of the trial court’s grant of mandamus in favor of appellees.

The City’s ordinance provides that a conditional use “shall be permitted subject to” certain specified conditions. “Shall” is generally construed as a word of command. State v. Henderson, 263 Ga. 508, 510 (436 SE2d 209) (1993). Thus, if appellees satisfied the conditions enumerated in the ordinance, the City had no discretion to deny their application. Jackson v. Abercrombie, 229 Ga.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Fulton County v. BartenfeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Jackson v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Payne v. BorkatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Municipal Electric Authority v. 2100 Riveredge Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API