Legal Opinion

Kadera v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 29, 1996No. 1 CA-SA 95-0265PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

Krag and Erin Kadera (“Petitioners”) bring this special action asking this court to accept jurisdiction and determine whether a cooperative corporation may initiate summary proceedings against a cooperator-shareholder in an alleged breach of an occupancy agreement. For reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On January 22, 1993, Petitioners purchased one share of stock in Consolidated Cooperative of Scottsdale East, Inc. (“Respondent”/“Respondent Corporation”) from a former shareholder. Respondent is a nonprofit…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. In Re: Steven R. Drummond, Mary A. DrummondArizona Supreme Court · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API