State Ex Rel. Daniels v. Council of Portsmouth
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Counsel supporting the demurrer predicate their position upon the sole proposition that the absence of the names of a committee of five in the initiative petition makes it fatally defective in view of the mandatory provisions of Section 27 heretofore set forth.
In Dillon v. City of Cleveland, 117 Ohio St., 258, 158 N. E., 606, this court held that where a municipality has adopted a charter containing initiative and referendum provisions which are reasonable and not in contravention of the constitutional provisions relating thereto, such charter procedure must be followed in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. GibbonsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Poor v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Bloker v. GabelOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Bedford v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Polcyn v. BurkhartOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Shaw v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Riehl v. MaloneOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State ex rel. Samuelson v. Conrad, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County1968