Legal Opinion

Simpson Investment Co. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2000No. 67630-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— This dispute between Simpson Investment Company (Simpson) and the State Department of Revenue (Department) presents the question of whether Simpson, a holding corporation for multiple subsidiaries, is a “financial business” for purposes of RCW 82.04.4281 (section 4281). Section 4281 provides a Business and Occupational (B&O) tax deduction for the investment income of all persons not “engaging in banking, loan, security, or other financial businesses.” RCW 82.04.4281. The Department assessed B&O taxes against Simpson, claiming it was not entitled to deduct its investment income because it is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. RefuerzoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Antio, LLC v. Dep't of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Getty Images (Seattle), Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State Of Washington v. Valentin DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API