Legal Opinion

In re Bradley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 5, 1979No. Appeal No. 79-533PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection of claims 1-6, all of the claims in appellants’ application serial No. 570,331, filed April 21, 1975, for “Switch System Base Mechanism,” as being drawn to subject matter which is non-statutory under 35 U.S.C. § 101. We reverse.

The Invention

Appellants’ invention is in the field of computer technology. It does not relate to computer applications, i. e., any specific task that a computer is asked to perform, but rather to the internal operation of the computer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  4. In re ChatfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. In re ChristensenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re AbeleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. In re WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  4. In Re Thomas P.H. Warmerdam and Bernard J.H. VerwerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. In re MaucorpsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API