In re Maucorps
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 of claims 1-5 and 7-13 of application serial No. 536,839, filed December 27, 1974, entitled “Computing System for Optimizing Sales Organizations and Activities.” We affirm.
The Invention
Appellant’s invention is a computer-implemented model of a sales organization. It determines the optimum number of times a sales representative for a business should visit each customer over a period of time. The optimum number of sales…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re ChatfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re RichmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In re SherwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.