Legal Opinion
In Re Thomas P.H. Warmerdam and Bernard J.H. Verwer
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 11, 1994No. 93-1294PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Thomas P.H. Warmerdam and Bernard J.H. Verwer (collectively Warmerdam or appellants) appeal the January 28, 1993 decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 92-3680. The Board affirmed the rejection of claims pending in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/430,749 (the ’749 application) in part for lack of statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (1988), and in part for indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 2 (1988). We affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part.
BACKGROUND
Warmerdam filed the ’749 application…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc., Excel Communications Marketing, Inc., and Excel Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.