Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Dicaro
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 19, 1988No. 87-1891PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for involvement in a scheme to transport stolen barrels of electrocobalt, alleging trial error by the district court and prosecutor. He also appeals from an additional sentence he received under 18 U.S.C. § 3147 for committing the offenses while released on bond. We find no trial error and affirm the underlying convictions, but vacate the additional two year sentence under § 3147.
I
In January of 1983, Paul DiCaro was released on bond pending trial for racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 and 1962(c). He was convicted on both…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Jerry ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Joseph Rodriguez v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Department of Corrections, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United States v. Dean William Cotnam and Phillip ZadurskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Angela Faye Onick and Alvin TolliverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.