Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schenck v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 7, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

Since 1917 the town of Stamford has had a board of finance, established under the provisions of the statutes, now Chapter 28 of the General Statutes. On October 3d, 1932, the relator was elected a member of that board for a term of six years, and qualified and acted as such member. On January 21st, 1935, the board passed a resolution declaring a vacancy in its membership “because of disqualification by [the relator’s] acceptance of the appointment to the salaried office of Chief Deputy Commissioner of Finance ... of the City of Stamford,” which is a municipal corporation within the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ryan v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Bryan v. CattellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Eberle v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stolberg v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Butera v. LombardiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Jewett v. SattiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Moore v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Rowland v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API