Legal Opinion

Moosally v. WW Norton & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 2004No. 3769PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Fred Moosally, Joseph Miceli, John Morse, Robert D. Finney and Dale E. Mortensen (collectively referred to as “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction to W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., Charles C. Thompson, II, and Daniel Meyer (collectively referred to as “Respondents”). Additionally, Appellants appeal from the trial court’s grant of Respondent W.W. Norton’s motion to dismiss pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 15-5-150 (1977), the door closing statute. We affirm as to Thompson and Meyer. We reverse and remand as to W.W.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cockrell v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Tuttle Dozer Works, Inc. v. Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. Hidria, USA, Inc. v. DeloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Sullivan v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORP.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API