Legal Opinion

RDO Foods Co. v. United Brands International, Inc.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided March 19, 2002No. A2-01-088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEBB, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

The Court has before it two motions. First, defendant Matthew Osgood has moved this court to dismiss the action against him for lack of personal jurisdiction (doc. # 5). Plaintiff RDO Foods Co. (“RDO”) opposes dismissal (doc. #21). The Court has reviewed the motion, the supporting and opposing briefs and affidavits, along with the entire file. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that RDO Foods Co. has made a prima facie showing of jurisdiction against Matthew Osgood, and the motion is therefore DENIED (doc. # 5).

Second, also…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Tiger Manufacturing Corp. v. Loadstar Material Handling Equipment, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2004
  4. International Decision Systems, Inc. v. JDR Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API