Legal Opinion

Miller v. Chicago Portrait Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1917No. 5909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit by appellee to restrain appellant from engaging in the same business in which appellee is engaged or in, a competing business in the state of Texas for a period of one year from January 16, 1917. The business of appellee is that of enlarging photographs into portraits finished in oil, crayon, and pastel, and in selling frames and other merchandise in connection with said business. It was alleged that appellee, on or about January 1, 1916, entered into a contract with appellant whereby the latter agreed to perform certain stipulated duties, and continued to perform such duties…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. McCurry v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Ropes v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Harris v. TheusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Krueger, Hutchinson and Overton ClinicTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Grace v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Byers v. Trans-Pecos Abstract Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. May v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Dyer v. Caldcleugh & PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API