Legal Opinion

Pitchford v. Hamrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1946No. 15596PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant, Mrs. Pitchford, did not come to this court within 30 days from the final trial of the case on a direct bill of exceptions assigning error on the ruling complained of in the exceptions pendente lite; but the assignment of error on the ruling is made in a bill of exceptions based on the judgment sustaining an oral motion to dismiss a written motion, which she made more than 30 days after the final and supplemental decrees had been rendered. A party can come to this court by a direct bill of exceptions assigning error on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Hardin v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henry v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API