Legal Opinion
Pao Tatneft v. Ukraine
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 24, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-0582Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAO TATNEFT, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-582 (CKK) UKRAINE, Respondent/Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 24, 2020) Pending before this Court is Petitioner Pao Tatneft’s [1] Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award and to Enter Judgment in Favor of Petitioner.1 Pao Tatneft, formerly known as OAO Tatneft, brings this action to enforce a 2014 foreign arbitral award entered in favor of Petitioner Pao Tatneft and against Respondent Ukraine by the International Arbitral Tribunal in OAO Tatneft v. Ukraine, an arbitration seated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. Saint Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Jean Schmitz Leonard Schmitz v. Carlos J. Zilveti, III Nicholas S. Meris Prudential-Bache Securities Inc., AKA Prudential Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.