Legal Opinion

Harward v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 453PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YalbNtiNE, I.

The sole question presented upon this appeal is the validity of the judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff’s case turns upon his own testimony and that of a mechanic. If the evidence of these two makes out a case of actionable negligence and proximate cause against either or both defendants, the plaintiff is entitled to a new trial; otherwise, the judgment of nonsuit must be sustained.

The term negligence as used in the law of torts lends itself to a wide use of language, but all the definitions employed by the courts and used by the textwriters revolve around want of due care or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Rountree v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Lynch v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Broughton v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Supera v. Moreland Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. J. W. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Ford Motor Company v. Loreto Mondragon, Ford Motor Company v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, by Farmers Underwriters Association, Attorney-In-FactCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  3. United States Rubber Company v. Eugene BauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Whitson v. FrancesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Gwyn v. Lucky City Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API