Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Company v. Loreto Mondragon, Ford Motor Company v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, by Farmers Underwriters Association, Attorney-In-Fact
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1959No. 16207_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
The two civil actions here involved, based upon established diversity of citi zenship jurisdiction, arise out of essentially the same facts. The actions were consolidated for trial and were tried to a jury. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in each action. Defendant’s motions for directed verdict and for judgment n. o v. were overruled. Defendant has appealed from final judgments entered upon the verdicts.
Mondragon, plaintiff in Case No. 16,-206, purchased a new 1955 Ford Thunderbird, manufactured by the defendant, through a San Francisco, California,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dick v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Soreide v. Vilas & CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Ford Motor Company, a Corporation v. Marvin D. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Lovas v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Menne v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Bankers Life & Casualty Company v. C. M. Kirtley, Trustee in Corporate Reorganization Proceedings of Automatic Washer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Schneider v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.