Legal Opinion

Moore v. Blackstone

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1919No. Civil No. 1671PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of' the Superior Court of the county of Maricopa. F. H. Lyman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a simple statutory action of unlawful detainer. The controversy involves the possession of the property described as S. i/2 of the S. % of the N. E. % of See. 12, T. 2 N., R. 1 E., G. and S. R. B. and M., Maricopa county. The jury before which the case was tried in the court below found the defendant guilty.

The question for consideration relates alone to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment to the effect that defendant was in actual possession of the property as tenant of plaintiff at the time of the commencement of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Phoenix-Sunflower Industries, Inc. v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Byrd v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. United Effort Plan Trust v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API