United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rathbun
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial. The facts were stipulated, hence the appeal challenges only the legal conclusion directing judgment for plaintiff.
The facts-necessary to be stated are these: The defendant bank was designated a depository for state funds in December, 1919, and plaintiff executed its bond to the state conditioned that its principal, the bank, should pay over to the state treasurer, whenever demanded, all moneys belonging to the state which theretofore had been or thereafter might be deposited with the bank. In the written application for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Knighton v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- McArthur v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Furnold v. Bank of the StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- National Surety Co. v. BerggrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leach v. Commercial Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Fidelity Etc. Co. v. State Bank of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- American Surety Co. v. State Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- American Surety Co. v. PeytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.