Legal Opinion

People v. McKimmy

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 27, 2014No. Supreme Court Case 13SC702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice

T1 This case requires us to clarify the process for invoking one's rights under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act ("the UMDDA" or "the Act"), §§ 16-14 101 to -108, C.R.S. (2014). When prisoners strictly comply with the UMDDA's procedural requirements, the Act mandates that they be brought to trial on pending charges within 182 days of their request. §§ 16-14-102(1), 16-14-104(1), C.R.S. (2014). Even when prisoners do not strictly comply with the UMDDA's requirements, we have previously determined that they nevertheless invoke their rights under the Act if (1) their request…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kempter v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. MascarenasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. People v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. People v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. LenteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. People v. PendletonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. ClantonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Sandstead-Corona v. Sandstead—Implied Trusts—Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. People v. FieldsColorado Court of Appeals · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API