Legal Opinion
United States v. Pinson
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 19, 2002No. 01-0466/AFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge CRAWFORD
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted at a general court-martial by military judge alone of disobeying a no-contact order (one specification), assault (two specifications), subordination of perjury at a prior *490trial (one specification), and communicating threats (three specifications), in violation of Articles 92, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 USC §§ 892, 928, and 934. He was also found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of adultery, in violation of Article 134. The convening authority approved the sentence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. LewisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. NewhouseUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Specialist JOSHUA D. WHITEArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019