State v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 Jeffrey G. Hubbard appeals his conviction of felony violation of a no-contact order. Hubbard argues that the trial court erred in admitting exhibit 1, a clerk’s minute entry made during his sentencing on a prior conviction, which established that he was served in open court with a no-contact order. Hubbard contends that admission of the minute entry violated his Sixth Amendment confrontation rights. Because the clerk’s minute entry is not a testimonial statement, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 The State charged Hubbard by amended information with felony violation of a no-contact order and first degree *184d…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. JasperWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Of Washington, V Justin Michael HartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. Jake James W. Sigurdson, App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington, Resp/cross-app v. Danzel L. Phipps, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington, V Catherine Anne BettsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State Of Washington, V Toribio A. SoteloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015