Royston v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.
In his sole point on appeal Mr. Royston argues that the trial court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We agree and remand for such a hearing.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Mr. Royston was charged with two counts of drug trafficking. The first count arose out of the search of a residence which Mr. Roy-ston alleges was owned by his mother and was rented to a Michael Adams. The police found over six grams of cocaine in the residence during the search. Mr. Royston was present in the house at the time of the search…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State v. NolanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Bauer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- May v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Voegtlin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Lomax v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Price v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Morrison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.