Legal Opinion

Voegtlin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2015No. ED 101851PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Presiding Judge

Introduction

Appellant Franklin R. Voegtlin (“Voegfc-lin”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Voegtlin pleaded guilty to one count of the Class C felony of stealing by deceit at least $500. Voegtlin was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to ten years’ imprisonment. Voegtlin subsequently filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of plea counsel, which the motion court denied without an evidentiary hearing,

Voegtlin now contends on appeal that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. Vaca v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. JEREMY W. ARATA, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Ronald Taylor v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Rueger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Heller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Joshua Hackman v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API