Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 28, 1989No. 1-88-1592PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI
delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiff, Robert Harrell, 1 brought this action alleging that the defendant, Montgomery Ward & Co. (Ward), discharged him from its employ in violation of the terms of certain policy statements issued by Ward. The trial court granted Ward’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615), and Harrell has appealed. The issue on appeal is whether the allegations of the complaint sufficiently state a claim for breach of an employment contract pursuant to Duldulao…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Vickers v. Abbott LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Ettenson v. BurkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Business Systems Engineering, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Arneson v. BD. OF TR., McKENDREE COLLEGEAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Doyle v. Holy Cross HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.