Swanson v. State

Rose and Ererly, JJ.,

dissenting.

Not being in agreement with that part of the opinion adopted by the majority of this court which adjudges that *100the amendment to section 1, article IV of the Constitution, adopted in 1936, was effective to totally abolish the constitutional existence of the office of commissioner of public lands and buildings, we respectfully dissent therefrom, and, in support of our position, submit the following:

The text of section 1, article IV of our Constitution, as now amended, is set forth in the majority opinion and will not be repeated here. This section was the only…